Amazing
Destinations LessonIntroduction
Year Level: 9-12
This lesson is designed to encompass several class periods, such as 4 periods with time for homework if computer labs are not always available. Students will plan a trip to 6 world cities and use their math skills to solve problems encountered along the way.
Materials
Computer with Internet access. Amazing Destinations: Student Worksheet for recording their findings.
Prior Knowledge
Basic understanding of ratio, percentages, internet, and map skills, spreadsheets. Teacher will in f irst lesson give overview re: the strengths and or abilities with basic spreadsheet functions including sum and graphing.
Task
The students will locate 6 cities, one on each of the 6 major continents. They will find distances for each leg of their journey, convert to percents, use a time zone map, and convert to foreign currencies. This information will be recorded on a Amazing Destinations: Student Worksheet .
Resources
Spreadsheet (e.g. Microsoft Excel)
International
Time Zone Calculator
World
Timezone Map
International
Distances
Choose a
Currency
Full Universal Currency Converter
STUDENT'S INSTRUCTIONS
OUTCOMES /VELS: LEARNING
STANDARDS
Assessment:
Students will be
assessed according to the following assessment rubric.
|
|
1
Unsatisfactory response (1-3) |
2
Satisfactory response (4-6) |
3 Competent
response (7-8) |
4 Exemplary
response (9-10) |
|
|
Purpose of the task not accomplished. Does not successfully communicate relevant ideas;
Presents fragmented understanding of concepts; results may be incomplete |
Purpose of task not fully achieved; some
strategies may be ineffectual Gaps in conceptual understanding evident.
Limited communication; results may be incomplete or not clearly presented. |
Accomplishes purposes of task. Understands major
concepts, though some less important ideas missing. Clear understandings
of concepts. Communicates effectively. |
Fully achieves purpose of task, while insightfully
interpreting, extending beyond tasks. Demonstrates in-depth understanding of concepts
and content. Communicates effectively and clearly to various audiences,
using dynamic and diverse means. |
|
Content |
Minimal
content. Fragmented and incomplete ideas. Unworkable spreadsheet.
Poor attempt at modelling.
|
Incomplete,
not labelled, instructions for spreadsheet not clear. |
Spreadsheet
calculations operable and workable. Minor mistakes in maths calculations.
Steps explained. Overall clear content.
|
Project
completed successfully. Full and clear explanations in modelling,
calculations and spreadsheet. Understood deeper mathematical content.
Steps clearly explained. Diverse content. |
|
Layout
& Presentation |
Fragmented and incomplete components, with major
elements missing; no evidence of achieving a workable result and
presentation. |
Minimal attempt to provide an ordered and
sequential project. Limited communication such as headings and comments to
assist reader to navigate through project. |
Good attempt to provide a sequential project.
Effective communication throughout. Major features of task and
spreadsheet set out clearly. Some minor details lacking in descriptors.
Visual layout could be improved. |
Good attempt to provide a sequential project.
Effective communication throughout. Major features set out clearly.
Excellent layout. |
|
Writing and
Oral Reporting |
Minimal
description of project and what was accomplished
|
An
attempt at describing project, but was in a general form only with missing
elements.
|
A
good description of the project. Some of the reasons for steps and
processes, and connections not present, including comments in spreadsheet.. Major concepts
explained |
An
excellent and clear description of the project. Included comments in
spreadsheet. Well described reasons for steps and processes, and
connections present. Additional information included. |
|
Technical |
Did not producea workable worksheet. Minimal
technical input to task. |
Produced very basic worksheet with formulas, but
not complete. Not clearly presented and integrated. |
Produced a good worksheet with formulas, but not
complete in minor areas. Acceptable and adequate technical input, overall
being clear and integrated. |
Project completed successfully. Fully functional
spreadsheet. Calculations fully operable. Excellent modelling showing
technical aspects. Very clearly presented and integrated. Technically went
beyond expectations. |
Copyright [Author: Robert Dodd ]